Thugs dodge death penalty for ghastly crimes

If you're a liberal snowflake, don't read this post.  It not only describes horrible crimes that will upset you, but shows how stupid liberals absolutely ensure these horrible crimes will happen over and over, since liberals have this insane love-relationship with murderers and rapists.

According to liberals, the murdering, raping piece of shit below is a woman.

Seriously. The murderous piece of shit--original name Steven Hayes--now claims to be a woman.  And because of that claim, foolish liberal morons have allowed the POS to change its name to "Linda Mai Lee" and to demand that taxpayers fund an endless list of demands related to making its dreams of being female more plausible.  

This POS claims to be female...and libs agree!

 

In 2007, in the normally-peaceful town of Cheshire, CT, this POS and a younger POS he met in prison raped and murdered a mother and two daughters, ages 11 and 17.  Hayes tied the daughters to their beds, strangled the mother, then poured gasoline on the daughters as they were tied to their beds, and set them on fire.

Hayes and his younger POS partner in crime were on parole--the liberal shithole state's first mistake, which continues to this day.  They deliberately targeted the mother and 11-year-old daughter as they were shopping, followed them home, and raped them and set them on fire.

As the two murderous pieces of shit fled the burning home in the victim's car, they crashed into a police cruiser and were arrested.  DNA proved beyond doubt that Hayes had raped both mother and the 11-year-old.

Both pieces of shit were convicted and sentenced to death.  But as you already guessed, both managed to dodge the richly-deserved death penalty.  Reason is that two years AFTER the mother and both daughter were raped and burned alive, the liberals who run Connecticut's state legislature passed a law outlawing the death penalty for any crime.   

Seriously, that's how dumb liberals are.  But because the ghastly crimes described above were committed before the liberals who rule the legislature outlawed the death penalty, rational people would think those sentences would still be carried out, since the law allowed the death penalty when the thugs murdered the mother and daughters, eh?

But of course in liberal/Dem-ruled states, the story always gets worse.  Because in liberal Connecticut, moronic liberals rule EVERYTHING, not just the state legislature.  So even though the death penalty was allowed--and richly deserved--when the pieces of shit murdered the mother and both daughters, two years after the legislature outlawed that penalty, the state's supreme court RULED that outlawing the death penalty really meant murderous pieces of shit sentenced to death before the law was changed couldn't be executed! 

And it gets worse: Hayes has now been moved to a prison in equally liberal shithole of Oregon, where he has demanded that taxpayers pay for him to get fake boobs.  And the morons of Oregon obeyed.

Now Hayes is demanding that the state pay for him/her/it to get hair transplants so it no longer looks like a fat, balding male.  And of course makeup and female hormones.

Hayes also says he/she/it is "happy to be alive."  This is galling since during the sentencing phase 15 years ago, as a ploy to avoid the death penalty Hayes's attorney said his client wanted the death penalty as atonement.  That was a lie, and a ploy.  Didn't deter the jury, but liberal morons in the legislature and the state's supreme court spared both killers.

So to summarize: thugs rape and murder a mother and two daughters--one just 11 years old.  They're sentenced to death by a jury, but liberals in both the state legislature and the state supreme court act to overturn that.  Now one of the trannies is living his/her/its best life as a self-declared woman, demanding taxpayers pay for an endless series of "gimmees."

Democrats: "Dis beez guuuud, citizen!  'If abolishing the death penalty saves the life of just one innocent person, it's worth it!'"

Me: "So if leaving the DP in place saves the life of just one innocent victim, why is that not worth it?"

Democrats: "Uhhh...ummm...cuz we're smaht and you deplorable!" 

Now here's the absolutely predictable result: In January of this year (2025) Newsweek posted a story by a shithead liberal about this case.  But instead of outrage, by the 4th 'graf the piece was wailing about "trans rights" and how trannies were victims of assaults.

Wait...how did this shithead manage to twist the ghastly rapes and murders by tranny Hayes from rape and murder of three totally innocent females to "trans iz victims"? 

Ah, I see you're not familiar with liberal lies.  Newsweek's employees know what their goal is--and it's not justice or protecting you or your family.  They're following the Democrat party line.

Now: obviously nothing can undo the past, but rational people could ensure that evil people don't get released by moronic judges and Dem politicians.  But that won't happen, because the Democrat party demands that people who commit crimes be released without having to post bail, and be released after serving only a fraction of the time to which they were justly sentenced.  Made to wear useless ankle monitors.  (Yeah, dat helps.  Not.)

Democrats are selling out you and your families, to be nice to the people the "true victims:" murderers, rapists, drunk drivers, drug smugglers, drug sellers and the like.  It makes libs feel virtuous.  And if a few hundred innocent Americans a year are killed or raped, liberals just shrug: "Bad things have always happened, citizen!  None of it is ouah fault!  Ouah policies din' have nuffin' t'do wif your daughter being raped or murdered!  Nope nope nope!  So shut up."   

Hayes strangled the mother and burned the daughters alive after raping both

 

The Media...doing their job of trashing Trump and praising all Democrat policies

When bribem was occupying the Oval Office, if the stock market set a record high that almost always led the nightly "newz," eh?

This year the Dow-Jones "industrials"--the number that leads all the market reports--has set a new record high not just once or twice, but 18 times.  New records are so routine that the Lying Mainstream Media barely mention it.  If they mention it at all it's way down in the "newz" broadcast.  

Hmmm...wonder why record highs for the DJ-30 are no longer nearly as newsworthy to the Lying Media today as they were when bribem was vegetable-in-chief?

It's a total mystery.  Of course duh Media explains that they would have treated record DJ-30 numbers the same as befo', but that under Orange Dragon dere iz SO much mo' impo'tant stuff dey haz t'tell ya: Trump ordering drug-smuggling boats blown up, endless footage of ICE agents arresting sweet, innocent "immigrants" as women scream obscenities and Dem pols scream dat it's a CRIME to deport illegal immigrants!  Cuz Dems bleat "No one is illegal," eh citizen?

The Lying Media always leaves out that crucial word "illegal."  They want you to believe illegals have as much right to be here as U.S. citizens.

Because the Mainstream Media is doing such a great job of trashing Trump and fellating Democrats for their crappy policies, I'll be absolutely shocked if Dems don't win control of the House 11 months from now.   

Price of gasoline is at lowest since before bribem took office. By coincidence, U.S. oil production...

In June of 2022--with Joe bribem having been the nominal president for over a year--the average nationwide price of gasoline was $5.20 per gallon.

Today--with Trump as president for less than a year--the same average nationwide price of gasoline is $2.95 per gallon.

Residents of NYC don't care cuz they don't drive much, and they're not smart enough to realize that the price of gasoline and diesel affects lots of other prices.  But if you live in the southwest it's a big deal.  (When I lived in a small west Texas town we often drove 60 miles each way to go to dinner at a different restaurant.) 

And here's the kicker: As you may have heard, a big chunk of the price of gasoline is the price of...oil.  So how's that doing?

Well on January 15 of this year--a week before Trump took office--the price of the benchmark "West Texas Intermediate" crude oil was $80 a barrel.  Today it closed just under $59--down a whopping 26 percent from bribem's last week in office.  And it's undoubtedly just a total coincidence that U.S. oil production just hit an all-time high.

Democrats: "Whut?  Why would yew claim producing more oil would make duh price fall?  Dat jus' crazy-talk!  Everyone know dere ain't no connection between price and supply!  Duh oil companies jus' set any price dey want, an' we gots t'pay it!"

There's a great field of study called "economics."  You might look into it sometime.

 

For more on oil, click here. 

SecWar says fentanyl is deadly enough to be considered a "chemical weapon." True?

The Left (Democrats) are wailing that the Trump administration is killing drug smugglers.  In response, the head of the military (SecWar Hegseth) noted that drugs like fentanyl are so lethal that they could be considered chemical weapons.

That led me to do a bit of research:  When determining how deadly a poison is, there's a benchmark called "LD50"--the dose calculated to kill half of those exposed to it.  

Two of the most deadly chemical weapons known are Sarin, and a thing called "VX."  Both are "nerve agents," variations of organophosphates.  They kill by causing muscles to go into constant contraction.  Death occurs by suffocation because you can't breathe.

Turns out for a 70kg (154-pound) person the LD50 for Sarin  is 25 to 30 milligrams.  (If you have no idea how much that is, one of those little yellow packets of Splenda weighs 1,000 milligrams.)

VX is even more powerful:  The LD50 for VX is just 5 to 10 milligrams.

Anybody have even a vague idea what the LD50 is for fentanyl?  Take a guess, out loud.  Then highlight the line below to show the answer.
  Two milligrams.

The Left (Democrats) wail that the cartel drug boats are "only" smuggling cocaine (which they imply, but cunningly do NOT explicitly claim, is no big deal, eh?), and no doubt that's most of their cargo.  But if just one boat carries just one 20kg bag of fentanyl, that could potentially kill five million Americans if divided into ten million pills.

Democrats: "You can't prove what they're carrying, so no big deal, deplorable!  So you mus' stop bombing deez po' fishermen jus' cuz dey happen to have enuf dinero to buy a boat wit $100,000 just for the four 300-horsepower Merc engines!"

Okay Pete, here's a free idea for how to solve a whole bunch of problems: replace the exploding missiles now being used to blow up the drug boats with a plain ol' 200-pound chunk of solid iron with a laser guidance system--the ones that can fly thru a small window.  Obviously not as fast as a missile but if you drop from overhead it'll work fine.  

Drop a couple of those and they'll not only put a couple of big damn holes in the boat but will probably break a gas line and start a small fire.  So the boat's out of action.  Then after a day or so, U.S. Navy leisurely motors up to the stopped boat and says "Hey, if ya like, we'd be glad to let y'all use our radio to call your boss and tell him what happened, and ask him to send someone to pick you up."

Of course we know that won't happen, so after another day or so our guys say "We'd be happy to take you to the U.S.  There the Democrats will give you money and fly you home.  But y'gotta tell us who's in charge of your op."  And then split 'em up for interrogation.

Much better. 

Democrat corruption in Minnesota explained in 40 seconds

1. Of the 5 million people in Minnesota just 110,000 or so are Somalis, and only half or so of the Somalis are U.S. citizens.  So the Democrat party (operating in Minnesota as the "Democrat Farmer-Labor party") doesn't need their votes to win every election.  

2. Given that math, there's no reason Minneapolis and the state government should have turned a blind eye to the staggering fraud that has stolen at least a billion dollars from state aid programs (most of the money for which came from the federal government).  And yet by all accounts the state ignored reports from state workers claiming massive fraud as it was occurring.

3. Almost all the fraud came in three programs: "Feeding Our Future," pushed thru by Ilhan Omar; a program with the stated purpose of finding housing for favored groups; and a program intended to treat children with autism.  All three programs were looted by Somalis.  State employees who reported likely fraud say they were threatened with being called racists if they persisted.  

4. During last November's presidential election, the Mainstream TV Media inflicted endless hours of video of Tim Walz on long-suffering Americans.  Anyone over age 20 or so could instantly see this guy wasn't playing with a full deck.  Total screwball.  And since when he was running for governor, his advisors knew he didn't need Somali votes, why pander to the Somalis, eh?  Sure: guy was getting huge donations from various Somali groups.  And I suspect we'll eventually find that groups taking part in the massive fraud accounted for a lot of it. 

5. You'd think brazen thieves would lay low until the attention died down.  But in much of Africa, theft is not only normal but is expected.  And for what it's worth, TikTok is now awash with videos by Somalis laughing that they now OWN Minnesota--because the biggest scammers fled back to Somalia before they could be arrested.  And of course they can't be extradited back to the U.S. to stand trial.

6. All these scams happened while bribem occupied the White House, but national Democrats know the Mainstream Media won't ask 'em about it.  They don't have to say a word about the fraud.  All they have to do is let the news cycle move on to bowl games and Christmas and New Years Eve, and 90% of Americans will have totally forgotten about the whole thing.  And no one will pay attention to the other ten percent.  Is this a great country or what?

Trouble in the UK...and what it means

The UK, Ireland, Sweden and all of Europe except the Visegrad Four are on a trajectory that bodes poorly for the native populations.  The Marxists and the Muzzies will unite in vying to take over--at which point the cradle of Western Civilization, the Reformation, the Enlightenment, the Renaissance and the Industrial Revolution will fall into a second Dark Age--which may last for a couple of centuries.

After the united Commies and Muzzies take over, they’ll turn on each other for ultimate power.  That’s exactly what happened in Iran in the 1980s. 

Of course Iran was already Muslim, but my guess is that in non-Muslim countries the Muzz will defeat the commies because they breed so much faster than everyone else.

You’d hope Americans would watch the takeover happening before our eyes in France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany and Austria, and would learn from it, and some will.  But the leaders of the Democrat Partei [sic] will never learn:  They’ll continue to believe Islam is peaceful--and great Dem voters!  So they’ll actually try to help the Muzz win power, believing they’ll be good Democrats.  Hahahahaha!

My parents were U.S.-born but world travelers.  Dad got an engineering degree, then at age 23 was aircraft commander of a B-17 for 35 missions in WW2.  In 1945 he became an instructor at the Air Force test pilot school.  One of his classroom students was Chuck Yeager, who was already an ace.  My dad just taught him engineering--and flew jets with him and other students.  He taught me to fly at 10, and I soloed at 15. 

Later my dad got a law degree and got into the international oil business.  For 20 years my parents lived a few yards from Speakers’ Corner in Hyde Park, London.  Both my sisters had law degrees.  My brother and I were both military pilots.

I mention all this because otherwise y’all may think I’m just as clueless as most of the folks you see on the Net.  But by total good luck (and lots of hard work), and great parents, I’ve been all over the world and have done things you wouldn’t believe.  I’ll put my experience and expertise up against anyone’s.  So when I say “There’s a problem...,” you can be damn sure there’s a problem. 

So with that long intro: One of the blogs I follow has lots of highly-educated world travelers--many with former military experience--as commenters.  Lots of readers have been stationed in Europe or the UK, and have traveled there later.  One post dealt with the dire straits the UK finds itself in, due to the ghastly socialist Labour ruling majority (460 seats in Parliament, vs. 130 or so for conservatives).

That post triggered hundreds of comments from readers who'd lived in London or had been stationed in the UK.  I’ve copied a few of those below.  None of the quotes below are mine.  Let me know if any of their comments rings a bell.

* “Unless the Brits awaken from their slumber, they’re doomed.”  Indeed.  But there’s no awakening: cops are arresting and jailing Brits for making social media posts that merely criticize Islam.  All the pols are in the pockets of the Muzz.

* It's not just the UK, unfortunately. It's almost the entire western world.
   I’ve spent years traveling around the world and the direction the west was headed was obvious *over a decade ago* to anyone who was paying attention.  That direction isn’t a conspiracy theory or some cosmic coincidence, it's a plan.  And except for the U.S. its been wildly successful. 
   Darkness is descending on much of the world.  Normally the U.S. would be expected to help, but now the Democrat party blocks that, just as they got their leftist judges to force Trump to pull the Guard out of Dem-ruled shithole cities; just as they’re demonizing deporting illegal aliens.  What do you think that portends for the future?

* The liberal, globalist elites who run Europe erupted in fury this week after the Trump administration released its new national security strategy, which called for less immigration.
  The head of the EU parliament’s globalist Renew group blasted the U.S. plan, calling it “dangerous.” She even went so far as to brazenly label the Trump administration “an enemy of Europe” for questioning the EU’s failed progressive agenda and increasingly authoritarian policies.
   Pro-immigration activist Gerald Knaus hysterically declared the U.S. a “direct threat to European democracy and peace.” He absurdly accused Washington of plotting to break up the EU and NATO.

*Industry and the British economy are collapsing as an insane obsession with NetZero by Ed Milliband is causing English electricity prices to skyrocket--now the highest in Europe.  As a result England is deindustrializing and working class jobs are disappearing forever. As industry vanishes, the economy gets weaker and weaker.

* One of the reasons the UK never does anything to stop illegal immigration is that the leaders of the powerful Labour party see immigrants as natural Labour voters, and workers to replace the falling native-Brit birthrate.  Sound familiar?

* In Venice recently I was sitting next to a young couple from the UK, maybe 30 years old.  Both had that perfect high-class brit accent.  Somehow we started talking about london, and I mentioned how Islam seemed to be taking over.  The girl said "Oh, no problem, they are lovely people."  Wow.

* Illegal immigrants to the UK are lavishly supported by UK taxpayers, per the orders of their “wokie” government.  Given that lavish support, illegal immigrants will never leave, and the Labour party won’t try to make ‘em, because Labour needs the invaders’ votes.
  One might think native Brits of the “working class” could rally enough votes to force Labour pols to change policies, but modern authoritarian regimes (and the UK absolutely is) have learned how to isolate, marginalize and destroy dissident movements before they can get going.  The rulers just keep charging the dissidents with “hate speech” and jailing ‘em for a year or two at a time.  Viz Tommy Robinson.

* The socialist media in the UK constantly tell readers/viewers that a) all immigrants are fleeing oppression; b) they’re all law-abiding and just want the same thing native Brits want; and c) they’re all hard-working taxpayers and are needed to keep the National Health Service operating.  Sound familiar?

* All the people in power in the UK are leftists, so they totally lack the ability to link cause and effect.

* Before we’re too hard on the Brits, consider the Democrats here, and their reaction to the news that Somalis in MN stole billions in “aid” dollars: the Dems are *furious at us for noticing and saying anything!*  Dems bleat that “Duh Somalis are duh real victims here.”
  It’s the same as British leftists who didn’t bat an eye at Muslim “grooming gangs” who raped young British girls, because “It’s their culture, and all good, enlightened people agree that all cultures are equal!”  And if you object to “grooming” the leftists call you a racist or “Islamophobe.”

* Most Brits--like most Europeons [sic] haven’t the faintest idea of what our Second Amendment does, or why it’s a great idea.  So if their politicians decide to confiscate civilian guns--as SO many have--they have no defense.  UK citizens have been charged with assault for *picking up an umbrella in their own home to defend against armed robbers.*

Lots more comments but you get the idea.  The point is that this is happening NOT in some African or middle-east shithole, but in the damn UK, home of the Magna Carta.  (For young Americans: that document was the first to claim everyone, even the king, was subject to the law.  Huge paradigm shift, eh?)

London is 15% Muslim, and for the last nine years has had a Muslim mayor.  He’s been elected three times and is the longest-serving.  You’d think that even if the 85% of residents who are NOT Muslims split, either Labour or Tories would have enough votes to win for their candidate, but for some reason....

Then you realize the same thing is happening here, as New York City residents elected an openly socialist Muslim as mayor of the largest U.S. city. 

So a good question now is, Does it matter?

In London, under Khan, knife and machete attacks have skyrocketed in the last nine years.  Like shootings or stabbings in NYC, most of these attacks only last a minute or two.  Almost no one is ever arrested because the attacker flees before cops arrive, and “no one saw nuffin’.”  Cops are useless, and residents seem resigned to the constant attacks, much like subway riders in NYC just shrug when another unfortunate woman is pushed into the path of an oncoming train by a druggie or schizophrenic and killed.

They just shrug: “Whut can be done?  Nuffin’.”

Welcome to the future--cuz as elections both here and in the UK show, soon you won’t be able to vote your way out of this.
 

Illegal alien with a LONG list of priors, and jumping bail, beheads a man in Dallas

Hey citizen!  Y’know all those faaabulous “undocumented Americans” the Democrats keep bleating about?  Here’s the story of one:

Dallas County DA Takes Death Penalty Off The Table for Illegal Alien In Motel Beheading Case

Last September an illegal alien from Cuba beheaded a man in front of the man’s wife and children, then kicked the severed head down a driveway in front of a startled family.

This happened three months ago, so since it was SO macabre, so outrageous, so ghastly, surely you heard about it from the Lying Mainstream Media, right?  Oh wait...you didn't.

Security-video footage shows the 37-year-old Cuban illegal alien--a demon with an extensive history of arrests in multiple states—kicking the victim’s head down the driveway in front of a family walking by.

On the morning of September 10, Yordanis Cobos-Martinez and a female co-worker were cleaning rooms at the motel where they were employed.

They were interrupted by their manager, who reportedly told them not to use a broken washing machine.  According to the co-worker, the illegal was offended that the manager had asked her to translate for him, rather than speaking to the illegal directly.

Security video then shows Cobos-Martinez following the manager out of the room, pulling out a machete and beheading him in front of his wife and son.

Video-cam footage then showed the illegal then kicking the dead man’s severed head down the driveway in front of a confused family of onlookers who had been walking by.  He then picked up the head and tossed it into a dumpster.

The illegal was swiftly arrested, and reportedly admitted the murder to a detective.

So because this beheading was SO ghastly, you did hear about it on the nightly network "newz" or read about it in the Mainstream Media, right?  Because this is the kind of thing you need to know about to make informed decisions on which party to vote for, right?  

But of course you didn’t hear a word about it.  Think there might be a reason?

Democrat: “Sure, deplorable:  Dat cuz it beez of ‘local interest only.’  Ouah honest, unbiased Media knows you don't need to know 'bout it!”

Nice try, Dem shill.  If the killer had been a white native-born Christian it would have made front-page news all over the country, and would have been the top story on the evening national news.  But wait...I thought you bleated “local interest only,” eh?  Why would that suddenly change, eh?

But hey, we’re just getting started.  After the illegal was arrested, cops started uncovering his extensive criminal history:

In 2017 he was arrested in Florida for grand theft auto.  The charges were ultimately dropped.

Later that year, he was charged for attempting to carjack a woman in South Lake Tahoe while completely naked.  He tried to drag the woman out of her car before climbing in and wrestling with her before being arrested.
  Carjacking used to be really serious.  But somehow this illegal piece of shit was released on bail and immediately fled the state.  Any bets on whether he was NOT required to post any cash to get bail?  C'mon, man, it's the Peoples' Republic of California!

In 2018 the illegal was arrested in Harris County (TX) for indecency with a child.  The charge was dropped due to insufficient evidence, and in 2023 officials extradited him to California to face charges for the 2017 carjacking.

Back in Cali a jury reportedly acquitted him of carjacking but convicted him of false imprisonment.  He was again released on probation and again fled the state.

Starting to see a...um...pattern here?  Stupid or corrupt or merely shitty DA's and judges repeatedly releasing a demon to keep being a demon, eh?  Can they really be that stupid?  Yes, but I think we'll eventually find there's a lot more there. 

Back in Texas this piece of shit was arrested on a fugitive charge and taken into ICE custody.
ICE said the illegal had a “final order of removal to Cuba,” but was released by the bribem regime “because Cuba would not accept him because of his criminal history.”

Ahhh, the bribem machine releasing more criminal illegals again, eh?

After beheading his employer in Dallas, the piece of shit was charged with murder.  But  prosecutor Julie Johnson reportedly told the court her Democrat boss, District Attorney Creuzot, does not intend to ask for the death penalty.  Cuz...reasons. 

“See, dis po’ refugee wuz jus’ havin’ a hard day, an’ he snapped.  An' since he nevah did nuffin’ wrong befo,’ we don’ see no reason to seek duh death penalty.  He reeally a guuud boy, jus misunderstood!”

And this is a DA in f'n DALLAS!  This Democrat horseshit is everywhere. 

Source.

 

https://dallasexpress.com/city/dallas-county-takes-death-penalty-off-the-table-for-illegal-alien-in-motel-beheading-case/ 

Liberals and Democrats: "All religions are equal!" Really?

Let's compare, shall we? 

 

Democrats repeat this lie--endlessly--because if they can get you to believe it (and all Dems do), they can make the case that there's no logical reason to keep Muslims from flooding the U.S. 

Ask a high-ranking Muslim--an "imam"--which of the eight Muslim teachings listed on the right side of the pic above they think Islam no longer agrees with.  Be prepared for EPIC evasion and non-answers. 

 

Democrat "logic" explained

Liberals (Democrats, socialists, leftists) always bleat dat duh gruberment needs to confiscate all guns from civilians.  "Cuz gunz kill pipo, so if confiscating all guns from civilians saves even ONE American life, it's worth it, right?" 

 

Let's accept your "logic."  In that case, since illegal alien invaders are proven to kill at least a couple of hundred Americans every year, then if deporting all illegals saves just one life, by your own Democrat "logic" that would be well worth it, right?

Democrats: "NOooo, WAIT!  Duh reasoning above ONLY applies to gunz, not to 'undocumented Americans,' since dey is all faaabulous pipo!  It's jus' a coincidence dat dey happen to vote Democrat!"

Ahhh, got it.  So yet another double-standard from Democrats:  "Saving jus' ONE life by confiscating guns beez reel guuuud!  But don't yew DARE use that reasoning to deport whut we cunningly call  "undocumented Americans!"  Yew cannot compare duh two!!!  

Does Minnesota really have 166 times more autistic kids than the national average?

Ilhan Omar helped push thru a state law to allow pipo to get state money by claiming to treat kids wif autism.  State finance experts--knowing the national incidence of autism--estimated  the total cost per year to be about $3 million bucks.

Hey, dat's a nuffin' fo' Democrats, eh?  Cuz it beez reel impo'tant to "treat" autistic kidz, right?

Then--as planned!--Omar's Somali supporters opened literally hundreds of "treatment centers" claiming to be treating thousands of "autistic kidz."  In reality they were paying monthly kickbacks to Somali parents to claim dere kidz wuz autistic, to bilk state and federal taxpayers fo' duh cost of "treating" 'em.  

 

So...duh cost to taxpayers went exponential, jumping from the $3 mill per year estimate to $399 million per year.  The grifters didn't care that this implied Minnesota had 166 TIMES more autistic kidz than state analysts expected, cuz all dey keered about wuz gettin' duh benjamins, eh?

NOW..state DHS workers knew this was a massive fraud, but their complaints were totally ignored by supervisors--who were scared of being called raaaacis' if dey investigated and found massive fraud.  Is that cool or what?

If you think the fat, corrupt Democrat nominee for VP (for young Americans that's Tim Walz, Democrat governor of MN) didn't know about this, you're too naive to breathe without help.

Of COURSE he knew.  He just claims he din' know.  OH, but NOW he brags about "puttin' pipo in jail!" 

It's faaaabulous: He ignores massive fraud ($399 MILLION per year!) to keep gettin' dat sweet support from duh Somali grifters, despite being warned by state DHS investigators.  

"Buh...buh...buh Dis ain't corruption!  No no no no!  Reeeally!  Ouah faaabulous guv'nor din' know nuffin' 'bout dis!   Reeeally!"

It's actually laughable: Democrat voters in MN totally believe the state haz 166 times mo' autistic kiddies den duh national average.  Or dey believe duh analysts wuz jus' wrong.  It's a total hoot how much Dems will tie themselves into pretzels to avoid the only rational conclusion: their governor is either incompetent or on the take.  Pick either one ya want, morons. 

You've already forgotten the demon who set a 26-year-old white woman afire in Chitcongo

Because you’re a busy person you’ve already forgotten about the horrible attack described below.  I understand: stories like the one below scare you to death, so you wanna forget about ‘em.  I get it, really.

And the Democrat Partei [sic] and their Lying Media fellators want you to forget--will do anything to make you forget.  But you need to remember, cuz if you don’t, you’ll keep voting for the Dem politicians whose policies enable atrocities like the one described below to happen--over and over.  So with that intro...

Chitcongo has been totally ruled by Democrats for over 50 years.  The black mayor is a communist who was formerly head of the teachers’ union.

On November 17th in that Democrat-ruled shithole a 26-year-old white woman (Bethany MaGee) was riding the ‘L’ train, when with no prior interaction or provocation a black demon with 72 prior arrests and eight felony convictions poured gasoline on her, chased her screaming through the train car and set her on fire.

The flames burned her--horribly--and she’s now fighting for her life, entirely because the Democrats who totally rule Chitcongo and Illinois allowed the demon who did this--a demon with 8 felony convictions--to walk the streets free.

The demon was free to burn Bethany because DEMOCRAT governor JB Pritzker signed an insane law ORDERING that virtually all thugs arrested for serious crimes be released without having to post bail.  

Seriously.  This moronic fat turd of a governor proudly signed this law, because he’s a Democrat, and knows Democrat voters LOVE this policy--cuz it works SO well, eh?  Well, maybe not so well for the victims.  

The signing was celebrated by Chitcongo’s black communist mayor Brandon Johnson, who is totally fine with thugs burning innocent women on public transit, eh?  Oh wait...of course he says setting dis woman on fire was jus' awful--yet his policies ensure this happens over and over.  So do ya think he’s sincere (or rational)?  

Of course not.  He’s perfected the art of appearing to be concerned, while pushing exactly the policies that allow this to keep happening, over and over. 

Example: just three months ago, after the same demon who set the innocent 26-year-old on fire was arrested for another violent crime, a moronic Cook County judge released the demon with an “ankle bracelet” that transmits his location.  If you’re wondering how that could possibly prevent demons from killing or burning innocent victims, congratulations: you’re rational.

Democrat policies ensure--utterly predictably-- that thugs with multiple felony convictions will continue to be released, free to kill or burn or merely knife or shoot innocent people.  Dem pols will never change those polices as long as voters keep voting  for ‘em.

Chitcongo is beyond saving, because a majority of voters there are total, moronic Democrats.  They read about the 26-year-old soaked with gasoline and set afire by the demon and just shrug:  “Just another day ending in ‘y,’ eh?”

Now brace yourselves, cuz these same insane, deadly policies are coming to your city and state if you vote Democrat.  They’re national Democrat policies, and the Dems will ram them down your throat as long as doing so gets ‘em elected.  Cuz elections mean power.

As we approach Christmas, be glad you don’t live in a Democrat-ruled shithole. 

The White House decorated for Christmas. Beautiful, classy, tasteful.

The White House decorated for Christmas.  This video is just a minute long, and needs to be MUCH longer.   Congratulations and warmest wishes to Melania and her team!

 

The video is on Melania's official website, so of course it was immediately swamped with the most hateful comments imaginable from demonic leftist Democrats.  Reassuringly, glowing compliments and good wishes far outnumbered the demented demons.

Thanks again to you and your team for bringing fabulous taste back to the White House!  

Merry Christmas to all! 

Immigrant from Zambia, working for the USPS, stole $1.7 million in checks mailed to people on his route

Hachikosela Muchimba is a native of Zambia.  From December of 2020--while not yet a U.S. citizen--he worked as a mailman for the U.S. Postal Service in D.C.

In mid-2022 he became a U.S. citizen, and continued to work for the USPS until September of 2023, when investigators found he'd stolen 98 checks mailed to people on his route.

Total value was just under $1.7 million.

He was arrested at Dulles Airport as he tried to flee back to his home country, where the top ethos is "If no one is looking, steal anything you can."

And now the topper: U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras--himself the son of immigrants--sentenced this POS to just 5 years.  Cuz it wuz only about $1.7 mill, an' we iz a generous and forgiving nation when it comes to immigrants stealing us blind, eh?

What message does this send to other would-be thieves, eh? 

And what the F is the Post Office doing hiring non-citizens for positions where they can steal $1.7 million?  Last I heard there was a huge pool of people wanting to be hired by the P.O. cuz great pay and bennies and not much work.  And yet the P.O. finds it necessary to hire non-citizens??

Anyone care to bet whether this is the only USPS mailman ("letter carrier") stealing checks?  

https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/crime/judge-revokes-citizenship-of-ex-postal-worker-who-stole-16m-in-checks-tried-to-flee-to-zambia-hachikosela-muchimba/65-1d00bfe8-84da-4fb5-bef6-d3ce8a06a0e2 

National avg gas price below $3/gallon--and both Denver and OKC had under $2/gallon before TG!

On Tuesday (12/2/2025) the average price of gasoline in the US fell below $3 for the first time since May 2021, according to the AAA. 

For Democrats and young Americans: Anyone remember when duh faaaaabulous, corrupt vegetable bribem was installed?

Jan 20th, 2021.  And when that happened, gasoline was below $3 a gallon.  But with bribem and his band of leftist/socialists ruling the country, the price of gasoline kept rising and rising.

Finally in November of last year voters said “We’ve had enough of this Democrat horseshit,” and they elected “duh dread Orange Hitler.”  And miraculously the price of gasoline started to fall--along with the price of most other things.

But despite this good news, last week a thing called the “Conference Board” bleated that consumer confidence dropped from 95.5 in October to 88.7 in November--the lowest since April.

And here’s the REAL hoot: While the average price of gasoline nationwide is just under $3 a gallon, most states are around $2.50...and in some places gasoline just before Thanksgiving--when the price of gas usually goes UP--it was selling for less than two dollars a gallon!

Ahh, I hear my Dem friends claiming “Dis FAKE NEWS!  Dis not real!”  Do ya think a Denver TV station was in on what you Dem morons claim is the fake news?  Cuz Denver stations KDVR and KWGN broadcast live video from a Shell station (Shell!), giving its exact location, and the price: $1.94.

 

If this had happened when bribem was in office, the Mainstream Media would have put this on their national news broadcasts, with the intro “Here’s some great news for holiday drivers!”  But with Trump as president, do ya think this stunning good news made it onto even ONE of the Lying Mainstream network broadcasts?  Even ONE?

Hahahahahahaha!  Of course not.  That’s why you low-info, we-only-gets-newz-frum-duh-alphabet-networks never heard a word about it.  

Are ya starting to see how the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media control what you think is true?  If you get all your “newz” from the Lying, Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media you only see what they want you to see: pro-Democrat, pro-socialism, pro-tranny, pro-illegal, anti-Trump stories.  Not a single story is allowed on their broadcasts that doesn’t support The Narrative they’re hell-bent on feeding ya.

WAIT...let's see what duh faaaaabulous, owns-the-future AI says!  Cuz AI always tells us duh troof, right?  Hahahahahaha!  Are you people always this gullible?  

Notice the "weasel words"--loopholes--that enable AI to give the Democrat-fellating, Trump-denigrating response: "highly unlikely" and "consistently at $1.94."  So SEE, deplorables!  It wuzn't true!  Din' happen!  Cuz AI said...well, implied...dat it din't.

"If AI sez sumpin,' it mus' be true, cuz...it's a reeel smaht computah, an' computahs nevah lie!" 

I don’t have kids, and have enough resources to live well for the rest of my life, so when the utterly predictable results of Democrat/socialist policies destroy the nation I've loved, it won’t affect me.  I’ll feel sorry for your kids, since they didn’t deliberately do anything wrong--just what you taught ‘em.  Lambs led to the slaughter, eh?  By people like Chuck Schumer, Hakeem Jeffries, Eric Swalwell, Chris Van Hollen, Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, AOC, Jazzy Crockett, Elizabeth Warren, Cackles, Tim Kaine, Tim Walz et al, eh?  (Another 200 could go here.)

Electing Trump offered a slim chance to avoid disaster: abolish half a dozen corrupt, wasteful federal agencies, offer tens of thousands of federal employees a generous severance package to quit, stop wasting money on DEI crap, deport illegals who are living off taxpayer funds and so on.  But in almost every case a leftist federal judge ORDERED every agency restored, every employee re-hired.

A couple of these Trump initiatives could still be upheld by the Supreme Court, but I’m not gonna hold my breath.  

Dear Don: Dems are lining you up for a 3rd impeachment. Here's how to sink THEM

Dear Don: 

It’s been almost a year since I last wrote you, as I wanted to see if the advisors you selected were any good.  It’s now clear that a lot of 'em aren’t, and that by chance you're now badly in need of a couple of fast solutions to avoid being impeached a third time.

While there are half a dozen potentially fatal problems, the most pressing at the moment seems to be the claim by Democrats that sinking fast boats smuggling drugs into the U.S. is a "war crime."  

Yes, the Democrats and the Washington Post are calling it a war crime, and are firing up their base to support a third impeachment.  And predictably, cowardly RINOs are starting to sign on as they see the political winds shifting. 

My guess is you’ve got less than two weeks to de-fuse this before it costs Republicans control of the entire government.  So here’s how to fix it:

At every press conference and cabinet meeting and impromtu Q&A with the press as you walk to the chopper for the next three months, announce that since congressional Democrats have been bleating that blowing up drug-smuggling boats is a war crime, you’re inviting ‘em to introduce a bill declaring that if passed, in the future, unless congress has declared war, sinking a drug-smuggling boat will be an impeachable offense, regardless of the president’s political party.

Keep repeating that invitation, and ask Mike Johnson and John Thune to publicly promise--often!--to bring it up for a floor vote.  You know Dem leftists won’t be able to resist taking the bait, and after the members of the Squad and the other hard leftists--Swalwell, Ted Lieu, Hakeem, and a dozen senators--sign on as co-sponsors, lots of semi-Left Democrats, feeling pressure from the Left, will join ‘em. 

This is a win-win, because if the Dems' bill passes, you and other GOP will be able to say that the Democrats voted for opioids and related drugs killing 100,000 Americans a year over the U.S. killing a hundred or so drug smugglers enriching the cartels.

If the Dems can't get their bill passed, you still get a hundred videos of Democrat members pushing to protect drug smugglers, proving exactly the same point as if it passed--that Dems would rather 100,000 Americans die from drug overdose than let our military sink a few dozen drug boats.  

If you run with the solution I just described, next I’ll tell you how to get Putin to agree to your proposal for an end to the war.

Sincerely, 

Now that Trump is prez, Democrat-fellating Axios admits there's a problem with Social Security

Axios is a leftist, Democrat-fellating website, so it totally ignores all serious problems when the Democrats control things, only mentioning ‘em when the Republicans are in control (no matter how weak, due to the senate filibuster).

So with Trump as prezzy and the GOP having a majority in congress, Axios was eager to publish an article with the scary headline “Social Security’s day of reckoning is nearly here.”

Of course Republicans have been warning about this problem for decades.  But of course Democrats in congress have blocked every effort to pass any rule changes that might have made the eventual fix less dire--because just admitting the problem would cause a few million voters to realize that SS was always a Ponzi scheme from the start: it could only work by taking money from the paychecks of an ever-growing number of working people to pay promised benefits to a much smaller number of retirees.

Young Americans and Democrats don’t realize that Social Security is funded by seizing 6.2% of every citizen’s paycheck--and that employers are forced to pay ANOTHER 6.2% to the gruberment.  There’s also a cunning loophole that the if someone earns more than $176,000, there’s no SS tax on any earnings above that.  Cunning, eh?  Benefits the high earners, but why?  (To get big Dem donors to support the shit.)

Another piece of stupidity:  You get SS benefits even if you have investment income of a million dollars a year.  There’s no "means test" to get those SS dollars.  Stupid.  Of course that’s not the big problem, but still, congress should have ended that.

Axios trivializes the long-known problems by writing that people have “fretted about” it.  How about “Warned, with copious figures, of the coming danger”?  “Fretted” is designed to soothe.  “Don’t fret little lady!”  You bet, sparky.

The problem--which has has been known for decades--is that due to lower birthrates AND to the fact that only about 62% of able Americans are working (the rest are loafing on welfare), the total monthly “take” out of everyone’s paycheck AND the employer’s forced tax is no longer enough to cover the monthly payout in “benefits.”  

It’s so simple a child could understand it.

Making things worse is that for decades congress has stolen hundreds of billions from the  retirement fund to pay for more porkbarrel spending by grandstanding congresswhores.

Wait, my bad: they didn’t literally “steal” those hundreds of billions, merely “borrowed” ‘em.  Left IOU notes, just like borrowing from China, eh?

Congress was cunning enough not to steal ALL the money, but at the current rate of depletion the last dollar will be gone barely 8 years from now--2033.  And then, unless congress pulls some bullshit borrowing, Axios says “recipients would see a steep cut to their monthly checks.”

Axios goes on to say “there are deep divides over how to address the imbalance.”  Wait...what “imbalance”?  This is the first time the article uses that word.  Are they talking about SS paying out more in “benefits” than the system takes out of your paychecks?  Yes, but they don’t say that--and you can guess why.

And finally, dozens of paragraphs into the article comes the classic:

The program's own trustees have warned of its unsustainability for decades, but what is different now is that it is no longer a far-off problem.

You need to read that again to really appreciate the masterful way the Democrat-fellating shitheads at Axios excuse the failure by your dear “leaders”--corrupt rat-bastards for the most part--to fix the damn thing decades ago.  Cuz what’s different now is that the meltdown date is only 8 years in the future!

It’s like “Wow, who woulda’ thought time keeps on tickin’, eh?  You can’t blame US though, cuz we Dems nevah knew 'bout dat!”

Today the taxes taken from every American’s paycheck only cover 77% of monthly SS benefits, meaning that in 2033 the program will only be able to pay that percentage of current benefits--unless congress borrows the rest from China (or similar). 

The average SS beneficiary gets about $2,000 a month, which would then drop to $1,546.  

Of course congress won’t let that happen cuz that would be political suicide, eh?  So they’ll just kick the can down the road, as they always do!  They’ll do it by borrowing the extra billions needed every month, just like they do now with the rest of the money they DEMAND be spent.  Trump can’t cut a single program--not a single dollar--without some Democrat group suing--and the leftist judges always RULE that all the funds be restored.

Axios again:

The great question is how to solve this mismatch between the tax revenue that comes in and the benefits promised.

Ahh, this must be the “imbalance” mentioned many ‘grafs earlier. 

Axios laments that after the big “baby boom” when U.S. troops returning from overseas after WW2--grateful to be alive and eager to start families--Americans have been having fewer babies, thus fewer people entering the workforce and paying SS taxes.  But the number of people receiving monthly SS checks has steadily increased: 

In 2000 there were 3.4 workers per SS beneficiary.  Today that's down to about 2.7, and is predicted to reach 2.3 in ten years.

Eight years from now the shortfall between SS tax take and promised benefits is likely to be $350 billion per year.  Since the government is already projected to have to borrow a staggering $2.9 TRILLION in that year to cover spending already ordered by your stupid congress, adding $35O billion more may not seem like much, but it’s actually a 12% increase, which will move the date at which everything implodes closer. 

Today, due to the insane compulsion of congress to spend far more than the government takes in, the government is forced to pay one TRILLION dollars a year just in interest on our national debt.  And by 2033 that’s likely to be almost two TRILLION a year. 
 
Finally, 40 paragraphs into its propaganda piece, Axios admits the real problem:

“Every dollar of benefits paid to a recipient translates into a tax increase for someone else.”

Finally, there it is, the carefully-hidden secret of socialism: that politicians can’t give money to one person/group without taking it from someone else who worked for it...unless they either borrow or just print the money.  And corrupt or stupid or greedy politicians do both.

That explains why a majority in congress [spit] have ignored the well-known problems over the last 40 years.  Democrats didn’t want voters to realize the truth, that Social Security was a ponzi scheme.  And most Republicans went along because they’re as addicted to being able to order massive spending as Democrats.

Axios now has an expert explain the obvious: "If we [i.e. congress] had done this [??] decades ago, these changes would have been so much smaller. Instead we've [??] waited until the last minute.”  But of course there haven't BEEN any changes yet.  Cuz congress will NEVAH cut doze sweet, sweet SS bennies, eh?

Conservatives have been warning congress about this for 40 damn years.  But of course congress refused to listen.  So what’s this “we” shit? 

There are 3 variables: raise taxes, cut benefits, or change the structure of Social Security to kick the can down the road.

Raising taxes:  As noted, half of SS is funded by the gruberment taking 6.2% of every paycheck you get (but only up to $176,000, at which point no more is taken).  The other half is paid by your employer--another 6.2%.  And if you’re self-employed you pay the entire 12.4%.  That’s a HUGE hit.  I've been self-employed for decades, and paying 12.4% of every dollar-- NOT as income tax, but just to the Ponzi scheme--is infuriating. 

Democrats will demand that benefits not be cut by even a dollar--and Republicans will go along to avoid being thrown out of office at the next election.

Axios is perceptive enough to realize that if congress refuses to raise SS taxes or cut benefits, the only remaining option is to borrow the money--which would mean higher interest rates on U.S. borrowing. 

But after dumping this critical problem into Trump’s lap (so he can be blamed for not solving it), Axios wants to keep voters from realizing that the entire SS concept was a ponzi scheme doomed to failure--as are all socialist policies.  So they finish with:

The good news for current or soon-to-be retirees is that...Social Security will almost certainly be there for you.

Of course borrowing even more billions brings the inevitable implosion of the U.S. debt bomb years closer, but what difference does it really make whether the bomb hits in 2050 or 2060, eh comrade?  You’ve lived a great life, voted Democrat every election, hate Trump and conservatives, probably have a trans kid or two, so dis isn't your problem, right?

You don’t believe in life after death, so you’re confident there will never be any reckoning for your choices.  You can die at peace with the choices you've made.  Hey, nations come and they go, right?  Besides, as AOC and the Dems constantly tell us, “America was never great,” right?  So does it really matter?

What matters is: you moronic Democrats supported open borders, unlimited immigration, public schools pushing sex-changes on kids, “undocumented Americans” and prison inmates getting "free" sex-changes on the taxpayer's dime, libraries hosting “drag queen story hours,” releasing crazy druggies so they could kill innocent girls.

Oh wait, you din’ think that could possibly happen.  Wow.  An' when it did--time after time after time--you just shrugged: "Gee, bad stuff happens, eh?  But none of ouah policies had a thing to do wif it!"

Source: Axios

https://archive.is/VKaD0

https://www.axios.com/2025/11/29/social-security-trust-fund-2033 

The "five stages of death and dying" applied to a nation. Brits are furious

In 1969 psychiatrist Elisabeth Kübler-Ross speculated that people who get a fatal medical diagnosis went through five mental stages: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and finally, acceptance.

With that background, consider the reaction by leftists as several high-profile Brits have warned that the UK is (or soon will be) “impossible to live in.” 

That claim is supported by several undisputed facts:

• the number of Muslims in the UK has soared in the past two decades;
• most of these are illegal, crossing the Channel in boats, but the government policy continues to be ordering the UK equivalent of our Coast Guard to pick up the illegals and bring them ashore, where they get all the usual benefits;
• even though UK law bans polygamy, the Labour government (like our Democrat party) has consistently allowed illegal-alien Muslim males to not just have several wives, but to claim all of them for welfare purposes;
• Muslims typically have 6 children per female, compared to about 1.7 for native Brits, which ALONE will doom the U.K. as it ensures a Muzz majority;
• As a result, Muslims now have significant political power in the UK;
• In the past ten years greater London has seen a huge increase in the amount of knife violence.  In almost every case the attackers/killers are muslim.
• UK judges have been imprisoning Brits who dare to defend themselves or others against knife attackers; literally, defending yourself with an umbrella in your own home is an imprisonable offense;
• Judges are also charging Brits with “hate speech” for making social media posts critical of Muslims.  Defendants are always convicted, and have received jail terms of as much as 3 years;

The prime minister of the UK--Keir Starmer--is a self-declared socialist and member of the Labour Party, which pushes many of the same policies as our Democrat party.  But unlike the U.S, where voters are split almost evenly between the two parties--giving us a chance of electing a Republican president--in the UK decades of generous welfare and unlimited immigration have produced far more votes for the Labour party, so the chances of any other party winning a majority in Parliament are very low.

The House of Commons has 650 seats, and at the moment Labour holds 405, compared to just 119 for conservatives.  As a result, no substantive conservative bills ever pass. 

And this huge power imbalance is unlikely to ever end, because the Labour party, like the Democrats here, has a VERY effective strategy of bribing people to vote Labour for life, by promising their voters unlimited free shit.  So once Labour (or Democrats) has a majority, the machine is self-sustaining.  

With this background, we return to the five stages of emotional response to death:  The post at this link at top is about a comment made by a British citizen (Peter Hitchens) who warned that the U.K. will soon become unlivable, and that anyone who can should leave now.  

The idea that a nation as old and accomplished as the UK could become "essentially unlivable" can easily be seen as a kind of death, and the instant response from so many commenters was exactly the same as the first response to death by humans: heated denial, followed quickly by anger.  Commenters were furious: “How DARE he say people should leave!!  We must stay and fight!”

Then the leftist commenters showed their true colors: "Of course I did NOT mean that literally!  We must NEVAH fight literally!  Just strongly-worded letters!"  And you quickly realize that if anyone suggested staying and actually fighting to save the country, the leftist commenters would have called him a “domestic violent extremist” or some similar horseshit.

The angry commenters don’t really wanna fight for their country--perish the thought!  They’re just angry about Hitchens' assertion that the UK is in danger of becoming "unlivable."  Denial.

They don’t dispute any of the facts listed above that show the inevitable result, but just deny that those facts predict the loss of the essence of the nation that’s been a fountain of enlightenment and knowledge for 500 years or so.  And that's totally understandable.

Next comes bargaining, as the ruling pols--the sons and appointees of the ones who corruptly, stupidly, deliberately allowed unlimited illegal invasion, supported by their voters--make deals with the Muzz leaders to be allowed to stay in office--fawned over by the Media and Labour voters--for another few years.

Next is depression.  Not among the politicians, of course, since they have enough money to leave, but among those who can’t afford to leave.  "Little people"--what Hilliary called "deplorables"--will settle into the kind of depressed, resigned, head-down existence familiar to residents of the former East Germany, the USSR, communist Poland and Hungary and dozens of other totalitarian governments:  Keep your mouth shut, pay the jizya (if you’re a low-info Democrat, look it up) and hope your daughters aren’t too attractive.

Drug use and alcoholism will increase as people try to cope with what at least some realize has been lost. 

Depression gradually turns into acceptance as more Brits begin to realize that in WW2 America could help defend the UK from the Nazis because we could stage troops, aircraft and ships on their island nation.  But after the Muzz takeover none of that will be possible since the Labour government itself will be Muslim.  So the U.S. won’t be able to help.  The Brits will be on their own.

AI doesn't know of anyMuslim-ruled nation that's ever overthrown Islamic rule without outside help.  (Closest seems to have been Tunisia, which claims to be a democratic republic, but with Islam as its official religion--so still Muslim.) 

Past wars between Islam and Christian nations in Europe have been fought mainly on land, so besieged nations could be reinforced from behind the front lines.  But since the UK is an island it would take an amphibious invasion for the U.S. to help.  Obviously that’s hugely unlikely.

So...all that’s left is acceptance.

One more item Americans might need to consider: the UK has 225 nuclear warheads.  Three months ago, socialist leftist Starmer appointed a muslim female, Shabana Mahmood, as Home Secretary, an office responsible for “domestic security,” including law enforcement, immigration, national security, and counter-terrorism. Oversees the police in England and Wales, Border Force, and the Security Service (MI5), and handles policies on crime, immigration, drugs, and cyber security.  This is obviously a critical post to the security of the UK, and since her appointment didn't provoke a revolt, it would seem to be only a matter of time before Starmer appoints a Muslim Defence Minister--whose would be in charge of the troops who handle and guard the nukes.

Bet not one of ya knew that--because the U.S. Mainstream Media does NOT want Americans to pay any attention to unsettling events overseas.  Besides, who would ever imagine the UK could be taken over from the inside?  It’s as absurd as claiming a socialist Muslim could be elected mayor of the largest U.S. city!  

The Democrat strategy that's been working since 1900

And in light of my previous post noting that a majority of voters under 40 say they want the next president to be a socialist), try this:

Democrats have mastered a political strategy that’s so classic it’s been named: the Curley effect.

Works like this: Democrat leaders adopt policies that increase taxes on “the rich” (anyone making more than their neighbor) and give much of the loot to the poor.  Not surprisingly, this gets the poor to vote Democrat permanently, since they know that’s how to keep the free shit coming. 

So far, no surprise at all, eh?  But read on:

But over time, a growing number of the well-to-do and hard-working entrepreneurs get tired of the high taxes needed to pay corrupt pols and people who refuse to work, so they move to a city or state not ruled by Dems--further solidifying the power of the Democrat party in the first city or state.

The exodus of a small number of the wealthy is barely perceptible, but gradually reduces the amount of tax revenue to the ruling party.  And of course there are always more poor to feed and house, so more welfare costs every year.  But the loudest leftists of the Dem party demand ever-more-generous welfare policies.  So inevitably, ruling pols are forced to choose between more welfare and cutting city services.  Since their loudest leftists demand ever-more-generous welfare benefits, city services get less money and slowly deteriorate.
 
As the quality of life slowly deteriorates, due to reduced tax revenue forcing cutbacks in city services (police, street maintenance, trash pickup, etc), a few residents begin to suspect that Dem policies may not be the key to success that the Democrats promised.  So to silence these critics the Curleyists fire up voter support by fanning the flames of class warfare, demonizing “the rich” as “oppressors” and “exploiters of the poor.”  This always works: the few who see the real problem (Democrat policies) are said to be “acting white” or called “Uncle Toms” or  “counter-revolutionaries” (the communist term). 

Ultimately the most successful Dem pols are the ones who are the most skilled at firing up the voter base by claiming they’re being oppressed.  We see this in all top Dem pols: AOC, Chuckie Schumer, Hakeem Jeffries, Ilhan Omar, Al Green, Jasmine Crockett...the list is endless.

The combination of high taxes, crumbling city services and demonizing rhetoric encourages smart conservatives to flee.  This is called “shaping the electorate.”

The strategy is named after former Boston mayor James Michael Curley, who served four terms as mayor, three as a member of congress, one as governor, and dozens of other taxpayer-paid positions from 1900 until his death in 1958.  He became THE iconic model for Democrat pols to this day.  They’re the people rational folks should NOT want in government--and the Democrat party loves ‘em because they win...again and again.

And to show how effective this strategy is: only about 8% of voters in Massachusetts are registered Republican, and the state has ZERO Republican congresscritters.

After getting away with a cunning lie about a Republican presidential candidate, Democrat senator Harry Reid once smirked “It worked, didn’t it?”

To bring that full circle: Because the Lying Mainstream Media controls everything most Americans see and read, and never dispute or push back on brazen lies by Democrat pols, virtually NO Democrats believe Obozo used the U.S military and the CIA to kill thousands of foreigners (and a few U.S. citizens) overseas during his 8-year reign, but eagerly believe Trump ordering the military to sink drug-smuggling boats is committing "war crimes."  This great piece of Democrat propaganda will hand control of the House to the Dems in 2026, blocking any further Trump efforts to introduce rational policies.  

Dems (smirking): "It worked, didn't it?" 

Astonishing poll results: 51% of voters under 40 say they prefer a socialist as the next president

A national phone and online poll ten days ago shows a majority of voters under 40 say they want the next U.S. president to be...wait for it...a democratic socialist.

Predictably, a stunning 82% of Democrats under 40 said they wanted a democratic socialist as the next president.

You might not think any Republicans would want a socialist as president, eh?  But surprisingly, 24% of Republicans under 40 said they wanted a socialist president, and another 11% said they weren't sure.    

Among independents, 37% said they wanted a socialist to win in 2028, while just 31% opposed.  Another 32% said they weren’t sure, and since they're crowd-followers that means about 70% will support the socialist, since the Media will say socialism is faaaabulous.

Overall, 51% of likely voters ages 18 to 39 say they wanted a democratic socialist president, compared to 32% who didn’t, with 17% unsure. 

A majority (54%) said their parents supported socialism. 

Naive conservatives believe churches support conservative values, yet among respondents who said they attend church, 33% said their church portrays socialism favorably, compared to 28% who said their church portrays it unfavorably.

Not surprisingly, more women than men said they wanted a socialist president, because for at least 40 years feminists have been telling women that men are useless.  So more young women believe duh gruberment can do anything women once needed a man for.  (And of course in many cultures this is accurate.)

Again unsurprisingly, 75% of blacks want a socialist as president, along with 69% of Hispanics and 66% of other minority voters, compared to 42% of whites.  This is understandable because one of the pillars of socialism is taking money from the rich and giving it to the poor.
   Wait...isn’t that what the gruberment does now?  Why yes, yes it is.  But most of the beneficiaries of tax-funded free shit want more. 

So what’s likely to happen is this:  With the socialist Muzz Mamdani as mayor, crime in NYC will increase, but official reports will say the opposite.  Precinct chiefs will be pressured to show that result.  And no one will ever find any written evidence that the stats are fake.

Every quality-of-life metric will get worse, but no one will ever see the real numbers.  Even rumors that the official figures are fake will be carefully hidden until after the 2028 election.

So by all official metrics, in 2026, '27 and '28 NYC will appear to have a decent crime rate under their socialist mayor.  By contrast, the Media will constantly broadcast videos of po’ pipo in other states who are surviving on food stamps and other welfare--and the Media will blame Trump and the GOP for a terrible economy, just as they blamed the Republicans for the recent government shutdown.

As a result, all the Democrat candidates will try to out-do each other in pushing far-left policies.  Then the real fun will begin when stupid voters elect one of 'em as president.

Source.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/11/26/poll-majority-of-likely-voters-under-40-say-they-want-to-see-democratic-socialist-win-next-presidential-election/ 

I'm done: if the only solution is Civil War, so be it

I'm done.  

The thing that finally convinced me there's no other viable way to save what's left of this poor, besieged nation was a 3,000-word propaganda piece by the Democrat-fellating shitheads at Time Magazine just after an antifa moron assassinated Charlie Kirk.  But this story has nothing to do with that.

How many homes burn down every day in the U.S.?  Beats me, but it has to be at least 20-30.  But when a *second home* owned by a low-level Democrat judge burns, the leftists at Time scream it was "triggered by Trump!"  

Not a shred of evidence, of course, but morons believe it, so...

Oh, I hear my dumb liberal friends are saying that's just right-wing hyperbole.  Well take a look at Time's fucking headline:

House of South Carolina Judge Criticized by Trump Administration Burns Down

In case you didn't get it, Time "helpfully" tags this under "extremism"  
   --by propagandist: Miranda Jeyaretnam

Police are investigating the cause of a fire that burned down the home of South Carolina circuit court judge Diane Goodstein, who had reportedly received death threats for weeks related to her work.

The 69-year-old judge had received death threats in the weeks leading up to the fire.... Last month Goodstein blocked the state’s election commission from releasing any of its voter files to Trump's DOJ-- a decision criticized by Trump's Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dillon--and later reversed by the state Supreme Court.

For those unfamiliar with the law, when a state's Supreme Court reverses a lower judge's ruling, that's usually a big sign that the lower judge violated the law.  But most Dems have no idea what being reversed implies.

Trump's DOJ had sought the information as part of his March executive order restricting non-citizens from registering to vote.

Wait...Trump didn't restrict ANYTHING: non-citizens are already barred--by federal law--from voting in federal elections!  But the Media couch this as "Trump is restricting rights!" because that enrages Dem voters and attracts viewers.  Fans the flames of their outrage so more will vote in the mid-terms.
   In case you didn't get the message Time intended, read on:

The Trump Administration has sought to drastically reshape the election system *in the name of election integrity* by requesting--and in some cases suing!--states for voter registration data to compile a comprehensive centralized database.

Note the cunning phrasing by the liberals: "...in the name of election integrity.  That very carefully-worded phrasing implies that Trump is just using "election integrity" as an excuse to do...something.  The communist Dems at Time then explain that his real goal is restricting voting rights.  

The administration has sought data from more than 30 states and has considered pursuing criminal investigations into state election officials. Critics have argued that the Administration’s efforts are an attempt at disenfranchising voters from marginalized communities and overstepping states’ constitutional authority to control election procedures.
     If the fire at the judge’s house turns out to be targeted...

"If your mother was your father," eh?   Hypothetical horseshit.

...it may mark the latest incident of a startling rise in political violence in the U.S.

”Political violence in the U.S.” y’say?  Ya mean like assassinating Charlie Kirk?  "Why YES, deplorables!  Jimmy Kimmel told Americans on national TV that the killer was a MAGA supporter.

And while the Trump administration has blamed the left’s rhetoric for inspiring violence such as the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, an attack on a judge would come as the Administration has increasingly vilified the judiciary, blasting judges that rule against it as “U.S.A-hating insurrectionists.”

"...would come," eh?  Loaded with hypotheticals.  Fiction.  But it inflames stupid readers who do NOT realize there hasn't been ANY violence against the judges.  Endless "Suppose X happened" melodramas by the breathless leftist whores of Time.

Sub-head: Political violence on the rise

In addition to Kirk’s murder last month, the murder of Democratic Speaker of the Minnesota House of Representatives Melissa Hortman and her husband in June, and an arson attack at Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro’s residence in April...

By a leftist jew-hater!

...a number of judges who have ruled against Trump have also received attacks and threats from his supporters.

AHHhh, "attacks and threats," eh?  Let's hear the breakdown, assholes.  You put "attacks" first, suggesting more of the former.  Cite?" 

 “I’m hearing everywhere that judges are worried about their own safety,"

...said one Dem operative.  OOOhhh, so the propagandist spins this to "I'm hearing everywher...."  This is a variation of the classic Leftist dodge "Some say..."

"There are people who are inflamed by the incendiary comments by the president and members of Congress about judges. Public officials have legitimized attacks on judges with whom they disagree,” Nancy Gertner, a former judge and current professor of practice at Harvard, told the Guardian in May.

When someone shoots or assassinates a liberal judge, then I'll listen.  But right now the Left has assassinated a charismatic conservative, while leftist judges are...um...being sent pizzas?  Yep, here’s Democrat shithead Dickie Durbin:

Richard Durbin, top Democrat on the Senate judiciary committee, penned a letter to Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel requesting an investigation into “pizza doxxing” incidents against at least a dozen judges.

SEE, deplorable?  Both sides assassinate pipo dey don' like!  Reeeally!  Okay, maybe "pizza doxxing" is a tiny bit different than assassination, but it’s reeeeally close!!

“Threats against judges are threats against constitutional government,” said one New York judge.  “This is a basic authoritarian instinct,” said a professor at Harvard. “You cannot have a democracy where the elected government can do whatever it wants.”

Sub-head: Trump Administration’s targeting of judges

Wow, that's a direct accusation.  But Trump can't sue because "public figure."

Less than a year into his second presidential term, Trump has asserted an expansive view of his executive powers.  As of October, Trump has issued over 300 orders, proclamations, and memoranda, many of which have resulted in thorny and protracted legal battles. Between May 1 and June 23, federal district courts blocked 94% of Trump’s actions with temporary restraining orders or preliminary injunctions...
    Critics have said the sheer amount of litigation, some of which has been brought or appealed by the Trump Administration, could overwhelm the judiciary.

Wow, you asshole sons of whores are blaming Trump for bringing the actions or appealing, when lawsuits were filed by your party??   When a lower-court judge blocks a Trump order and your party sues, that doesn’t "overwhelm the judiciary," eh?  But if Trump appeals, suddenly it's swamping the courts, eh?  Your hypocrisy is boundless.

And of course stupid voters believe you.

The Time article goes on for another 2,000 words, but you get the gist.

Source: Time Magazine propagandists  

https://time.com/7323442/south-carolina-judge-diane-goodstein-house-fire-trump-political-violence/